![]() 12/04/2014 at 16:58 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
HOW THE HELL DO THESE TWO LOOK FAST?
http://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/re…
![]() 12/04/2014 at 16:01 |
|
They are red, and red means fast, right?
![]() 12/04/2014 at 16:01 |
|
YEAH!
![]() 12/04/2014 at 16:09 |
|
Meh, I can see what they're going for. That SR has a badge on the back that's obviously supposed to imitate Honda's Si or Ford's ST badge all while keeping a ~100 HP engine. And the Corolla is agressivized (new word) from the last gen in looks only.
![]() 12/04/2014 at 16:11 |
|
There's a sleekness to the body that makes them look grounded to the ground.
![]() 12/04/2014 at 17:00 |
|
The checks cleared....FAST!
![]() 12/04/2014 at 17:02 |
|
Damn beat me to it
![]() 12/04/2014 at 17:04 |
|
How the fuck is seven seconds to sixty slow? I think that's pretty damn quick.
![]() 12/04/2014 at 17:04 |
|
The BRZ and Mazda 6 are really the only ones I do agree with.
![]() 12/04/2014 at 17:07 |
|
My car takes over 12 and is still faster than what some of my friends and family drive...
![]() 12/04/2014 at 17:10 |
|
Duh! The dealer told me it added 50whp!
![]() 12/04/2014 at 17:11 |
|
It's a silly list. Even the 500 Abarth is on there. Are they really expecting drag cars?
![]() 12/04/2014 at 17:50 |
|
That whole article was click bate. I expect something like this from a reddit post not motor trend. Kinda sad. The Abarth did surprise me though.
![]() 12/04/2014 at 17:51 |
|
Bah ha ha ha!!! These cars look fast? Um no.
![]() 12/04/2014 at 17:54 |
|
My insurance rates sure agree with that "logic"
![]() 12/04/2014 at 18:12 |
|
That's what happens when you let people who don't know anything about cars write about cars.
![]() 12/04/2014 at 18:31 |
|
Because people are ignorant. Although, I do have to admit that that Corolla does look pretty damn grounded to the ground.
![]() 12/04/2014 at 18:33 |
|
the 2nd gen Matrix XRS looked fast. Only 150hp, compared to the last gen XRS that had 177 with a Celica motor.